Overview and terminology: Learn about Pilot, Istio’s core traffic management component and Envoy proxies and how they enable service discovery and traffic control for services in the mesh.
Traffic routing and configuration: Learn about the Istio features and resources needed to configure routing and control the ingress and egress of traffic for the mesh.
Network resilience and testing: Learn about Istio’s dynamic failure recovery features that you can configure to test and build tolerance for failing nodes, and to prevent cascading failures to other nodes.
Overview and terminology
With Istio, you can manage service discovery, traffic routing, and load balancing for your service mesh without having to update your services. Istio simplifies configuration of service-level properties like timeouts and retries, and makes it straightforward to set up tasks like staged rollouts with percentage-based traffic splits.
Istio’s traffic management model relies on the following two components:
- Pilot, the core traffic management component.
- Envoy proxies, which enforce configurations and policies set through Pilot.
These components enable the following Istio traffic management features:
- Service discovery
- Load balancing
- Traffic routing and control
Pilot: Core traffic management
The following diagram shows the Pilot architecture:
As the diagram illustrates, Pilot maintains an abstract model of all the services in the mesh. Platform-specific adapters in Pilot translate the abstract model appropriately for your platform. For example, the Kubernetes adapter implements controllers to watch the Kubernetes API server for changes to pod registration information and service resources. The Kubernetes adapter translates this data for the abstract model.
Pilot uses the abstract model to generate appropriate Envoy-specific configurations to let Envoy proxies know about one another in the mesh through the Envoy API.
You can use Istio’s Traffic Management API to instruct Pilot to refine the Envoy configuration to exercise more granular control over the traffic in your service mesh.
Traffic in Istio is categorized as data plane traffic and control plane traffic. Data plane traffic refers to the data that the business logic of the workloads manipulate. Control plane traffic refers to configuration and control data sent between Istio components to program the behavior of the mesh. Traffic management in Istio refers exclusively to data plane traffic.
Envoy proxies are the only Istio components that interact with data plane traffic. Envoy proxies route the data plane traffic across the mesh and enforce the configurations and traffic rules without the services having to be aware of them. Envoy proxies mediate all inbound and outbound traffic for all services in the mesh. Envoy proxies are deployed as sidecars to services, logically augmenting the services with traffic management features:
Some of the features and tasks enabled by Envoy proxies include:
Traffic control features: enforce fine-grained traffic control with rich routing rules for HTTP, gRPC, WebSocket, and TCP traffic.
Network resiliency features: setup retries, failovers, circuit breakers, and fault injection.
Security and authentication features: enforce security policies and enforce access control and rate limiting defined through the configuration API.
Service discovery and load balancing
Istio service discovery leverages the service discovery features provided by platforms like Kubernetes for container-based applications. Service discovery works in a similar way regardless of what platform you’re using:
The platform starts a new instance of a service which notifies its platform adapter.
The platform adapter registers the instance with the Pilot abstract model.
Pilot distributes traffic rules and configurations to the Envoy proxies to account for the change.
The following diagram shows how the platform adapters and Envoy proxies interact.
Because the service discovery feature is platform-independent, a service mesh can include services across multiple platforms.
Using the abstract model, Pilot configures the Envoy proxies to perform load balancing for service requests, replacing any underlying platform-specific load balancing feature. In the absence of more specific routing rules, Envoy will distribute the traffic across the instances in the calling service’s load balancing pool, according to the Pilot abstract model and load balancer configuration.
Istio supports the following load balancing methods:
Round robin: Requests are forwarded to instances in the pool in turn, and the algorithm instructs the load balancer to go back to the top of the pool and repeat.
Random: Requests are forwarded at random to instances in the pool.
Weighted: Requests are forwarded to instances in the pool according to a specific percentage.
Least requests: Requests are forwarded to instances with the least number of requests. See the Envoy load balancing documentation for more information.
You can also choose to prioritize your load balancing pools based on geographic location. Visit the operations guide for more information on the locality load balancing feature.
In addition to basic service discovery and load balancing, Istio provides a rich set of traffic routing and control features, which are described in the following sections.
Traffic routing and configuration
The Istio traffic routing and configuration model relies on the following Istio traffic management API resources:
Use a virtual service to configure an ordered list of routing rules to control how Envoy proxies route requests for a service within an Istio service mesh.
Use destination rules to configure the policies you want Istio to apply to a request after enforcing the routing rules in your virtual service.
Use gateways to configure how the Envoy proxies load balance HTTP, TCP, or gRPC traffic.
Use a service entry to add an entry to Istio’s abstract model that configures external dependencies of the mesh.
Use a sidecar to configure the scope of the Envoy proxies to enable certain features, like namespace isolation.
You can use these resources to configure fine-grained traffic control for a range of use cases:
Configure ingress traffic, enforce traffic policing, perform a traffic rewrite.
Set up load balancers and define service subsets as destinations in the mesh.
Set up canary rollouts, circuit breakers, timeouts, and retries to test network resilience.
Configure TLS settings and outlier detection.
The next section walks through some common use cases and describes how Istio supports them. Following sections describe each of the traffic management API resources in more detail.
Traffic routing use cases
You might use all or only some of the Istio traffic management API resources, depending on your use case. Istio handles basic traffic routing by default, but configurations for advanced use cases might require the full range of Istio traffic routing features.
Routing traffic to multiple versions of a service
Typically, requests sent to services use a service’s hostname or IP address, and clients sending requests don’t distinguish between different versions of the service.
With Istio, because the Envoy proxy intercepts and forwards all requests and responses between the clients and the services, you can use routing rules with service subsets in a virtual service to configure the routing rules for multiple versions of a service.
Service subsets are used to label all instances that correspond to a specific version of a service. Before you configure routing rules, the Envoy proxies use round-robin load balancing across all service instances, regardless of their subset. After you configure routing rules for traffic to reach specific subsets, the Envoy proxies route traffic to the subset according to the rule but again use round-robin to route traffic across the instances of each subset.
This configuration method provides the following advantages:
- Decouples the application code from the evolution of the application’s dependent services.
- Provides monitoring benefits. For details, see Mixer policies and telemetry.
For example, in A/B testing we often want to configure traffic routes based on
percentages. With Istio, you can use a virtual service to specify a routing
rule that sends 25% of requests to instances in the
v2 subset, and sends the
remaining 75% of requests to instances in the
v1 subset. The following
configuration accomplishes our example for the
apiVersion: networking.istio.io/v1alpha3 kind: VirtualService metadata: name: reviews spec: hosts: - reviews http: - route: - destination: host: reviews subset: v1 weight: 75 - destination: host: reviews subset: v2 weight: 25
Canary rollouts with autoscaling
Canary rollouts allow you to test a new version of a service by sending a small amount of traffic to the new version. If the test is successful, you can gradually increase the percentage of traffic sent to the new version until all the traffic is moved. If anything goes wrong along the way, you can abort the rollout and return the traffic to the old version.
Container orchestration platforms like Docker or Kubernetes support canary rollouts, but they use instance scaling to manage traffic distribution, which quickly becomes complex, especially in a production environment that requires autoscaling.
With Istio, you can configure traffic routing and instance deployment as independent functions. The number of instances implementing the services can scale up and down based on traffic load without referring to version traffic routing at all. This makes managing a canary version that includes autoscaling a much simpler problem. For details, see the Canary Deployments blog post.
A virtual service is a resource you can use to configure how Envoy proxies route requests to a service within an Istio service mesh. Virtual services let you finely configure traffic behavior. For example, you can use virtual services to direct HTTP traffic to use a different version of the service for a specific user.
Istio and your platform provide basic connectivity and discovery for your services. With virtual services, you can add a configuration layer to set up complex traffic routing. You can map user-addressable destinations to real workloads in the mesh, for example. Or, you can configure more advanced traffic routes to specific services or subsets in the mesh.
Your mesh can require multiple virtual services or none depending on your use case. You can add gateways to route traffic in or out of your mesh, or combine virtual services with destination rules to configure the behavior of the traffic. You can use a service entry to add external dependencies to the mesh and combine them with virtual services to configure the traffic to these dependencies. The following diagrams show some example virtual service configurations:
- 1:1 relationship: Virtual service A configures routing rules for traffic to reach service X.
- Virtual service B configures routing rules for traffic to reach services Y and Z.
Virtual service C configures routing rules for traffic to reach different versions of service W.
You can use virtual services to perform the following types of tasks:
Configure traffic rules in combination with gateways to control ingress and egress traffic
Add multiple match conditions to a virtual service configuration to eliminate redundant rules.
Configure traffic routes to your application services using DNS names. These DNS names support wildcard prefixes or CIDR prefixes to create a single rule for all matching services.
Address one or more application services through a single virtual service. If your mesh uses Kubernetes, for example, you can configure a virtual service to handle all services in a specific namespace.
Route requests to a subset
The following example configures the
my-vtl-svc virtual service to route
requests to the
v1 subset of the
apiVersion: networking.istio.io/v1alpha3 kind: VirtualService metadata: name: my-vtl-svc spec: hosts: - "*.my-co.org" http: - route: - destination: host: my-svc subset: v1
In the example, under
hosts lists the virtual service’s hosts. In this case, the
* is a wildcard prefix indicating that this
virtual service handles routing for any DNS name ending with
You can specify user-addressable hosts by using any DNS name or an internal mesh service name as long as the name resolves, implicitly or explicitly, to one or more fully qualified domain names (FQDN). To specify multiple hosts, you can use wildcards.
Also, note that under
route, which specifies the routing rule’s
destination, which specifies the routing rule’s
host: my-svc specifies the destination’s host. If you are
running on Kubernetes, then
my-svc is the name of a Kubernetes service.
You use the destination’s host to specify where you want the traffic to be sent. The destination’s host must exist in the service registry. To use external services as destinations, use service entries to add those services to the registry.
The following diagram shows the configured rule:
Route requests to services in a Kubernetes namespace
When you specify the
host field for the destination of a route in a virtual service
using a short name like
svc-1, Istio expands the short name into a fully qualified domain name.
To perform the expansion, Istio adds a domain suffix based on the namespace of the virtual service that
contains the routing rule. For example, if the virtual service is defined in the
Istio adds the
my-namespace.svc.cluster.local suffix to the abbreviated destination resulting in
the actual destination:
While this approach is very convenient and commonly used to simplify examples, it can easily lead to misconfigurations. Therefore we do not recommend it for production deployments.
The following example shows a virtual service configuration with fully qualified traffic routes
for two services in the
my-namespace Kubernetes namespace.
The configuration relies on the URI prefixes of the two services to distinguish
apiVersion: networking.istio.io/v1alpha3 kind: VirtualService metadata: name: my-namespace spec: hosts: - my-namespace.com http: - match: - uri: prefix: /svc-1 route: - destination: host: svc-1.my-namespace.svc.cluster.local - match: - uri: prefix: /svc-2 route: - destination: host: svc-2.my-namespace.svc.cluster.local
Using fully qualified hosts in the routing rules also provides more flexibility. If you use short names, the destinations must be in the same namespace as the virtual service. If you use fully qualified domain names, the destinations can be in any namespace.
A virtual service consists of an ordered list of routing rules to define the paths that requests follow within the mesh. You use virtual services to configure the routing rules. A routing rule consists of a destination and zero or more conditions, depending on your use case. You can also use routing rules to perform some actions on the traffic, for example:
Append or remove headers.
Rewrite the URL.
Set a retry policy.
To learn more about the actions available, see the virtual service reference documentation.
Routing rule for HTTP traffic
The following example shows a virtual service that specifies
two HTTP traffic routing rules. The first rule includes a
condition with a regular expression to check if the username “jason” is in the
request’s cookie. If the request matches this condition, the rule sends
traffic to the
v2 subset of the
my-svc service. Otherwise, the second rule
sends traffic to the
v1 subset of the
apiVersion: networking.istio.io/v1alpha3 kind: VirtualService metadata: name: my-vtl-svc spec: hosts: - "*" http: - match: - headers: cookie: regex: "^(.*?;)?(user=jason)(;.*)?$" route: - destination: host: my-svc subset: v2 - route: - destination: host: my-svc subset: v1
In the preceding example, there are two routing rules in the
indicated by a leading
- in front of the first field of each rule.
The first routing rule begins with the
matchLists the routing rule’s matching conditions.
headersSpecifies to look for a match in the header of the request.
cookieSpecifies to look for a match in the header’s cookie.
regexSpecifies the regular expression used to determine a match.
routeSpecifies where to route the traffic matching the condition. In this case, that traffic is HTTP traffic with the username
jasonin the cookie of the request’s header.
destinationSpecifies the route destination for the traffic matching the rule conditions.
hostSpecifies the destination’s host,
subsetSpecifies the destination’s subset for the traffic matching the conditions,
v2in this case.
The configuration of the second routing rule in the example begins with the
route field with a leading
-. This rule applies to all traffic that doesn’t match the
conditions specified in the first routing rule.
routeSpecifies where to route all traffic except for HTTP traffic matching the condition of the previous rule.
destinationSpecifies the routing rule’s destination.
hostSpecifies the destination’s host,
subsetSpecifies the destination’s subset,
v1in this case.
The following diagram shows the configured traffic routes for the matched traffic and for all other traffic:
Routing rules are evaluated in a specific order. For details, refer to Precedence.
Match a condition
You can set routing rules that only apply to requests matching a specific
condition. For example, the following configuration sets up a rule that only
applies to an incoming request that includes a custom
containing the exact value
apiVersion: networking.istio.io/v1alpha3 kind: VirtualService metadata: name: reviews spec: hosts: - reviews http: - match: - headers: end-user: exact: jason route: ...
You can specify more than one header in a rule. All corresponding headers must match.
Match request URI
The following routing rule is based on the request’s URI: it only applies to a
request if the URI path starts with
apiVersion: networking.istio.io/v1alpha3 kind: VirtualService metadata: name: productpage spec: hosts: - productpage http: - match: - uri: prefix: /api/v1 route: ...
Multiple match conditions
Conditions can have multiple matches simultaneously. In such cases, you use the
nesting of the conditions in the routing rule to specify whether AND or OR
semantics apply. To specify AND semantics, you nest multiple conditions in a
single section of
For example, the following rule applies only to requests for a
URL that begins with
/api/v1 and that include the custom
end-user header that contains the exact value
apiVersion: networking.istio.io/v1alpha3 kind: VirtualService metadata: name: productpage spec: hosts: - productpage http: - match: - uri: prefix: /api/v1 headers: end-user: exact: jason route: ...
To specify OR conditions, you place multiple conditions in separate sections of
match. Only one of the conditions applies. For example, the following rule
applies to requests for a URL that begins with
/api/v1 or to requests with the
end-user header containing the exact value
apiVersion: networking.istio.io/v1alpha3 kind: VirtualService metadata: name: productpage spec: hosts: - productpage http: - match: - uri: prefix: /api/v1 - headers: end-user: exact: jason route: ...
Routing rule precedence
Multiple rules for a given destination in a configuration file are evaluated in the order they appear. The first rule on the list has the highest priority.
Rules with no match condition that direct all or weighted percentages of traffic to destination services are called weight-based rules to distinguish them from other match-based rules. When routing for a particular service is purely weight-based, you can specify it in a single rule.
When you use other conditions to route traffic, such as requests from a specific user, you must use more than one rule to specify the routing.
It’s important to ensure that your routing rules are evaluated in the right order.
A best practice pattern to specify routing rules is as follows:
Provide one or more higher priority rules that match various conditions.
Provide a single weight-based rule with no match condition last. This rule provides the weighted distribution of traffic for all other cases.
Precedence example with 2 rules
The following virtual service configuration file includes two rules. The first
rule sends all requests for the
reviews service that include the Foo header
with the bar value to the
v2 subset. The second rule sends all remaining
requests to the
apiVersion: networking.istio.io/v1alpha3 kind: VirtualService metadata: name: reviews spec: hosts: - reviews http: - match: - headers: Foo: exact: bar route: - destination: host: reviews subset: v2 - route: - destination: host: reviews subset: v1
In this example, the header-based rule has the higher priority because it comes
first in the configuration file. If the match-based rule came second, these
rules wouldn’t work as expected. Istio would evaluate the weight-based rule
first and route all traffic to the instances in the
v1 subset, even requests
including the matching
You specify the path for traffic with routing rules, and then you use destination rules to configure the set of policies that Envoy proxies apply to a request at a specific destination.
Destination rules are applied after the routing rules are evaluated. Therefore, destination rules are matched against the destination in the routing rules, not the host of the virtual service itself. You can use wildcard prefixes in a destination rule to specify a single rule for multiple services.
You can use destination rules to specify service subsets, that is, to group all the instances of your service with a particular version together. You then configure routing rules that route traffic to your subsets to send certain traffic to particular service versions.
You specify explicit routing rules to service subsets. This model allows you to:
Cleanly refer to a specific service version across different virtual services.
Simplify the stats that the Istio proxies emit.
Encode subsets in Server Name Indication (SNI) headers.
Load balancing 3 subsets
The following example destination rule configures three different subsets with
different load balancing policies for the
my-svc destination service:
apiVersion: networking.istio.io/v1alpha3 kind: DestinationRule metadata: name: my-destination-rule spec: host: my-svc trafficPolicy: loadBalancer: simple: RANDOM subsets: - name: v1 labels: version: v1 - name: v2 labels: version: v2 trafficPolicy: loadBalancer: simple: ROUND_ROBIN - name: v3 labels: version: v3
As shown above, you can specify multiple policies in a single destination rule.
In this example, the default policy, defined above the subsets field,
sets a simple random load balancer for the
v3 subsets. A
specific policy, a round robin load balancer, is defined in the corresponding subset’s field.
See our destination rules reference documentation to review all the enabled keys and values.
Service subsets subdivide and label the instances of a service. To define the
divisions and labels, use the
subsets section in destination rules.
For example, you can use subsets to configure the following traffic routing
Use subsets to route traffic to different versions of a service.
Use subsets to route traffic to the same service in different environments.
You use service subsets in the routing rules of virtual services to control the traffic to your services. You can also use subsets to customize Envoy’s traffic policies when calling particular versions of a service.
Understanding service subsets in Istio allows you to configure the communication to services with multiple versions within your mesh and configure the following common use cases:
To learn how you can use service subsets to configure failure handling use cases, visit our Network resilience and testing concept.
Gateway configurations apply to Envoy proxies that are running at the edge of the mesh, which means that the Envoy proxies are not running as service sidecars. To configure a gateway means configuring an Envoy proxy to allow or block certain traffic from entering or leaving the mesh.
Your mesh can have any number of gateway configurations, and multiple gateway workload implementations can co-exist within your mesh. You might use multiple gateways to have one gateway for private traffic and another for public traffic, so you can keep all private traffic inside a firewall, for example.
You can use a gateway to configure workload labels for your existing network tasks, including:
- Firewall functions
- Network address translation
- IP address management
Gateways are primarily used to manage ingress traffic, but you can also use a gateway to configure an egress gateway. You can use egress gateways to configure a dedicated exit node for the traffic leaving the mesh and configure each egress gateway to use its own policies and telemetry.
You can use egress gateways to limit which services can or should access external networks, or to enable secure control of egress traffic to add security to your mesh, for example. The following diagram shows the basic model of a request flowing through a service mesh with an ingress gateway and an egress gateway.
All traffic enters the mesh through an ingress gateway workload. To configure the traffic, use an Istio gateway and a virtual service. You bind the virtual service to the gateway to use standard Istio routing rules to control HTTP requests and TCP traffic entering the mesh.
Configure a gateway for external HTTPS traffic
The following example shows a possible gateway configuration for external HTTPS ingress traffic:
apiVersion: networking.istio.io/v1alpha3 kind: Gateway metadata: name: ext-host-gwy spec: selector: app: my-gateway-controller servers: - port: number: 443 name: https protocol: HTTPS hosts: - ext-host tls: mode: SIMPLE serverCertificate: /tmp/tls.crt privateKey: /tmp/tls.key
This gateway configuration lets HTTPS traffic from
ext-host into the mesh on
port 443, but doesn’t specify any routing for the traffic.
Bind a gateway to a virtual service
To specify routing and for the gateway to work as intended, you must also bind
the gateway to a virtual service. You do this using the virtual service’s
gateways field, as shown in the following example:
apiVersion: networking.istio.io/v1alpha3 kind: VirtualService metadata: name: virtual-svc spec: hosts: - ext-svc gateways: - ext-host-gwy
You can then configure the virtual service with routing rules for the external traffic.
For more information:
Refer to the gateways reference documentation to review all the enabled keys and values.
Refer to the Ingress task topic for instructions on how to configure an Istio gateway for ingress traffic.
Refer to the Egress gateway task to learn how to configure egress traffic using a gateway resource.
A service entry is used to add an entry to Istio’s abstract model, or service registry, that Istio maintains internally. After you add the service entry, the Envoy proxies can send traffic to the service as if it was a service in your mesh. Configuring service entries allows you to manage traffic for services running outside of the mesh:
Redirect and forward traffic for external destinations, such as APIs consumed from the web, or traffic to services in legacy infrastructure.
Add a service running in a Virtual Machine (VM) to the mesh to expand your mesh.
Logically add services from a different cluster to the mesh to configure a multicluster Istio mesh on Kubernetes.
You don’t need to add a service entry for every external service that you want your mesh services to use. By default, Istio configures the Envoy proxies to passthrough requests to unknown services, although you can’t use Istio features to control the traffic to destinations that are not registered in the mesh.
You can use service entries to perform the following configurations:
- Access secure external services over plain text ports, to configure Envoy to perform TLS Origination.
- Ensure, together with an egress gateway, that all external services are accessed through a single exit point.
Refer to the Egress task topic for details.
Add an external dependency securely
The following example mesh-external service entry adds the
external dependency to Istio’s service registry:
apiVersion: networking.istio.io/v1alpha3 kind: ServiceEntry metadata: name: svc-entry spec: hosts: - ext-resource.com ports: - number: 443 name: https protocol: HTTPS location: MESH_EXTERNAL resolution: DNS
You must specify the external resource using the
hosts key. You can qualify
it fully or use a wildcard domain name. The value represents the set of one or
more services outside the mesh that services in the mesh can access.
Configuring a service entry can be enough to call an external service, but typically you configure either, or both, a virtual service or destination rule to control traffic in a more granular way. You can configure traffic for a service entry in the same way you configure traffic for a service in the mesh.
Secure the connection with mutual TLS
The following destination rule configures the traffic route to use mutual TLS
to secure the connection to the
ext-resource external service we
configured using the service entry:
apiVersion: networking.istio.io/v1alpha3 kind: DestinationRule metadata: name: ext-res-dr spec: host: ext-resource.com trafficPolicy: tls: mode: MUTUAL clientCertificate: /etc/certs/myclientcert.pem privateKey: /etc/certs/client_private_key.pem caCertificates: /etc/certs/rootcacerts.pem
svc-entry service entry and the
ext-res-dr destination rule
configure a connection for traffic to the
dependency using port 443 and mutual TLS.
See the service entries reference documentation to review all the enabled keys and values.
By default, Istio configures every Envoy proxy to accept traffic on all the ports of its associated workload, and to reach every workload in the mesh when forwarding traffic. You can use a sidecar configuration to do the following:
Fine-tune the set of ports and protocols that an Envoy proxy accepts.
Limit the set of services that the Envoy proxy can reach.
Limiting sidecar reachability reduces memory usage, which can become a problem for large applications in which every sidecar is configured to reach every other service in the mesh.
A Sidecar resource can be used to configure one or more sidecar proxies selected using workload labels, or to configure all sidecars in a particular namespace.
Enable namespace isolation
For example, the following
Sidecar configures all services in the
namespace to only reach services running in the same namespace thanks to the
./* value of the
apiVersion: networking.istio.io/v1alpha3 kind: Sidecar metadata: name: default namespace: bookinfo spec: egress: - hosts: - "./*"
Sidecars have many uses. Refer to the sidecar reference for details.
Network resilience and testing
Istio provides opt-in failure recovery features that you can configure dynamically at runtime through the Istio traffic management rules. With these features, the service mesh can tolerate failing nodes and Istio can prevent localized failures from cascading to other nodes:
Timeouts and retries
A timeout is the amount of time that Istio waits for a response to a request. A retry is an attempt to complete an operation multiple times if it fails. You can set defaults and specify request-level overrides for both timeouts and retries or for one or the other.
Circuit breakers prevent your application from stalling as it waits for an upstream service to respond. You can configure a circuit breaker based on a number of conditions, such as connection and request limits.
Fault injection is a testing method that introduces errors into a system to ensure that it can withstand and recover from error conditions. You can inject faults at the application layer, rather than the network layer, to get more relevant results.
You can use Istio failure recovery features to complement application-level fault tolerance libraries in situations where their behaviors don’t conflict.
Timeouts and retries
You can use Istio’s traffic management resources to set defaults for timeouts and retries per service and subset that apply to all callers.
Override default timeout setting
The default timeout for HTTP requests is 15 seconds. You can configure a virtual service with a routing rule to override the default, for example:
apiVersion: networking.istio.io/v1alpha3 kind: VirtualService metadata: name: ratings spec: hosts: - ratings http: - route: - destination: host: ratings subset: v1 timeout: 10s
Set number and timeouts for retries
You can specify the maximum number of retries for an HTTP request in a virtual service, and you can provide specific timeouts for the retries to ensure that the calling service gets a response, either success or failure, within a predictable time frame.
Envoy proxies automatically add variable jitter between your retries to minimize the potential impact of retries on an overloaded upstream service.
The following virtual service configures three attempts with a 2-second timeout:
apiVersion: networking.istio.io/v1alpha3 kind: VirtualService metadata: name: ratings spec: hosts: - ratings http: - route: - destination: host: ratings subset: v1 retries: attempts: 3 perTryTimeout: 2s
Consumers of a service can also override timeout and retry defaults with request-level overrides through special HTTP headers. The Envoy proxy implementation makes the following headers available:
As with timeouts and retries, you can configure a circuit breaker pattern without changing your services. While retries let your application recover from transient errors, a circuit breaker pattern prevents your application from stalling as it waits for an upstream service to respond. By configuring a circuit breaker pattern, you allow your application to fail fast and handle the error appropriately, for example, by triggering an alert. You can configure a simple circuit breaker pattern based on a number of conditions such as connection and request limits.
Limit connections to 100
The following destination rule sets a limit of 100 connections for the
reviews service workloads of the v1 subset:
apiVersion: networking.istio.io/v1alpha3 kind: DestinationRule metadata: name: reviews spec: host: reviews subsets: - name: v1 labels: version: v1 trafficPolicy: connectionPool: tcp: maxConnections: 100
See the circuit-breaking task for detailed instructions on how to configure a circuit breaker pattern.
You can use fault injection to test the end-to-end failure recovery capability of the application as a whole. An incorrect configuration of the failure recovery policies could result in unavailability of critical services. Examples of incorrect configurations include incompatible or restrictive timeouts across service calls.
With Istio, you can use application-layer fault injection instead of killing pods, delaying packets, or corrupting packets at the TCP layer. You can inject more relevant failures at the application layer, such as HTTP error codes, to test the resilience of an application.
You can inject faults into requests that match specific conditions, and you can restrict the percentage of requests Istio subjects to faults.
You can inject two types of faults:
Delays: Delays are timing failures. They mimic increased network latency or an overloaded upstream service.
Aborts: Aborts are crash failures. They mimic failures in upstream services. Aborts usually manifest in the form of HTTP error codes or TCP connection failures.
You can configure a virtual service to inject one or more faults while forwarding HTTP requests to the rule’s corresponding request destination. The faults can be either delays or aborts.
Introduce a 5 second delay in 10% of requests
You can configure a virtual service to introduce a 5 second delay for 10% of
the requests to the
apiVersion: networking.istio.io/v1alpha3 kind: VirtualService metadata: name: ratings spec: hosts: - ratings http: - fault: delay: percentage: value: 0.1 fixedDelay: 5s route: - destination: host: ratings subset: v1
Return an HTTP 400 error code for 10% of requests
You can configure an abort instead to terminate a request and simulate a failure.
apiVersion: networking.istio.io/v1alpha3 kind: VirtualService metadata: name: ratings spec: hosts: - ratings http: - fault: abort: percentage: value: 0.1 httpStatus: 400 route: - destination: host: ratings subset: v1
Combine delay and abort faults
You can use delay and abort faults together. The following configuration
introduces a delay of 5 seconds for all requests to the
v1 subset of the
ratings service and an abort for 10% of them:
apiVersion: networking.istio.io/v1alpha3 kind: VirtualService metadata: name: ratings spec: hosts: - ratings http: - fault: delay: fixedDelay: 5s abort: percentage: value: 0.1 httpStatus: 400 route: - destination: host: ratings subset: v1
For detailed instructions on how to configure delays and aborts, visit our fault injection task.
Compatibility with application-level fault handling
Istio failure recovery features are completely transparent to the application. Applications don’t know if an Envoy sidecar proxy is handling failures for a called upstream service, before returning a response.
When you use application-level fault tolerance libraries and Envoy proxy failure recovery policies at the same time, you need to keep in mind that both work independently, and therefore might conflict.
For example: Suppose you can have two timeouts, one configured in a virtual service and another in the application. The application sets a 2 second timeout for an API call to a service. However, you configured a 3 second timeout with 1 retry in your virtual service. In this case, the application’s timeout kicks in first, so your Envoy timeout and retry attempt has no affect.